Copyright Notice

© 1998 - 2018 Senniger Powers LLP. All rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to print, reproduce and distribute any pages of this web site provided the page is not modified and this page is included with any distribution.

This information is provided for general purposes only, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice or legal opinion. You should seek professional counsel directly before acting on any information obtained from this site.

The presentation of information on this Web site and the transmission of E-mail to our E-mail address does not establish any form of attorney-client relationship with our firm or any of our attorneys.

While attempts are made to maintain the accuracy of information on this Web site, this information may contain errors or omissions for which we disclaim any liability. Senniger Powers LLP makes no representations nor warranties about the contents of the Web sites to which links are provided. There is no sponsorship or affiliation between Senniger Powers LLP and any of the organizations and agencies to which links are provided.

A visit to this website, or an inquiry from this site to one of our attorneys or staff members, does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Senniger Powers LLP. Please do not send us any information that you consider confidential unless you receive from us an "engagement letter", which is written confirmation that we represent you.

Senniger Powers is extremely proud of the results it obtains for clients. However, pursuant to the Rules of Professional Conduct governing the Missouri Bar and the Judiciary, we are required to inform you that: Past results provide no guarantees for future outcomes. Each case must be judged on its own merits. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Recent IP Headlines


Supreme Court Expands the Territorial Scope of Lost Profits Damages

On June 22, 2018, in the case WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. No. 16–1011, the Supreme Court held that 35 U.S.C. § 284 allows a patentee to recover foreign lost profits when the patentee proves infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f)(2).


Federal Circuit Makes It Tougher on Coke to Protect Its ZERO Brand Name

On June 20, 2018, the Federal Circuit held that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("the Board") applied the wrong legal framework in determining the genericness of a number of The Coca-Cola Company's ("Coca-Cola") registered trademarks incorporating the term ZERO. The court vacated the Board's decision, and remanded the case back to the Board for further proceedings consistent with its ruling.


Chambers USA Recognizes Senniger Powers, Three Partners

Once again, Chambers USA has recognized Senniger Powers for its high-quality professionals and expertise in the intellectual property field.


Supreme Court:  IPR Patent Challenges Survive, with Modification

On April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court decided two cases involving patent law: Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC and SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu. 


Federal Circuit Rules Ban on Scandalous and Immoral Trademarks Unconstitutional

On December 15, 2017, the Federal Circuit held that the Lanham Act’s ban on registering scandalous or immoral marks is an unconstitutional restriction of free speech.


Tietz Named as New Partner

Senniger Powers is pleased to announce that Paul D. Tietz has been elected to the partnership effective January 2018.

Loading Data...