Disclaimer

Copyright Notice

© 1998 - 2017 Senniger Powers LLP. All rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to print, reproduce and distribute any pages of this web site provided the page is not modified and this page is included with any distribution.

Disclaimer
This information is provided for general purposes only, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice or legal opinion. You should seek professional counsel directly before acting on any information obtained from this site.

The presentation of information on this Web site and the transmission of E-mail to our E-mail address does not establish any form of attorney-client relationship with our firm or any of our attorneys.

While attempts are made to maintain the accuracy of information on this Web site, this information may contain errors or omissions for which we disclaim any liability. Senniger Powers LLP makes no representations nor warranties about the contents of the Web sites to which links are provided. There is no sponsorship or affiliation between Senniger Powers LLP and any of the organizations and agencies to which links are provided.

A visit to this website, or an inquiry from this site to one of our attorneys or staff members, does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Senniger Powers LLP. Please do not send us any information that you consider confidential unless you receive from us an "engagement letter", which is written confirmation that we represent you.

Senniger Powers is extremely proud of the results it obtains for clients. However, pursuant to the Rules of Professional Conduct governing the Missouri Bar and the Judiciary, we are required to inform you that: Past results provide no guarantees for future outcomes. Each case must be judged on its own merits. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Recent IP Headlines

04/19/2017

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 – Offer of Judgment:  A Useful Tool for Defendants Accused of Copyright Infringement

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68—a seemingly straightforward rule—provides a powerful, yet underutilized tool for any defendant, but particularly a defendant accused of infringing a copyright.

04/07/2017

Senniger Attorneys Published in The St. Louis Bar Journal

The Spring 2017 edition of The St. Louis Bar Journal features two articles on Intellectual Property issues written by Senniger Powers attorneys.

03/22/2017

Supreme Court Finds that Laches is No Longer a Defense in Patent Litigation

On March 21, 2017, the Supreme Court in a 7-to-1 decision, ruled that the equitable defense of laches is not available to a patent infringement defendant.

03/15/2017

Marc Vander Tuig Speaks on Significant 2016 Federal Circuit Decisions

Marc W. Vander Tuig was a co-presenter at the recently-held 2017 Federal Circuit Year in Review seminar at the Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis (BAMSL).

02/24/2017

Supreme Court Finds that Shipping a Single Component Abroad Can Never Constitute Infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f)(1)

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court found that Life Technologies Corp. is not liable for infringing a Promega Corp. patent in a situation where it shipped only a single component, Taq polymerase, to a facility in the United Kingdom that created allegedly infringing products.

02/07/2017

Robert Bain Named a Top St. Louis Lawyer for Your Small Business 

St. Louis Small Business Monthly has named Robert M. Bain one of the 2017 Top Small Business Lawyers. 

MARKETS |
Loading Data...